Diagnosis And Opinions With Limited Reasoning and Evidence

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Diagnosis And Opinions With Limited Reasoning and Evidence

Diagnosis ,Opinions , Limited ,Reasoning, Evidence

Communication Law Paper- Due Sunday @ 11:59

PAPER 1 ASSIGNMENT SHEET

Paper 1: Defamation and Privacy, Total Points: 100 In the first paper for the class, I want you to analyze one of the cases in the “The Law of Journalism and Mass Communication” textbook relating to either defamation law or right to privacy. You can find the many of the cases from the chapter in the case archive provided on the Sage website.

This archive has also been posted on blackboard for you. Select one of the cases and provide a useful brief of the case and its implications on law moving forward. Your analysis should be 3-4 pages (double-spaced), using college level syntax and grammar, have a works cited list that has at least (3) sources—yes, you can include the textbook as a source. Please include a copy/link of your case with your paper. Here is what you need to include: 1. Give us the legal citation.

2. Statement of Facts: Give us the basic facts of the matter, focusing particularly on why this case came to the Supreme Court. 3. Legal / Constitutional questions: Usually one or more. What issues was the Court asked to answer? 4. Court Decisions: What did the Court decide? 5. Reasoning of the Decision: The meat of the brief, this tells us why the Court decided as it did.

These are the answers to the questions. I expect you to identify and refer to the particular passages that establish constitutional precedent. Quote the Justices in your presentation and quote them in your handout. 6. Bottomline: What is/was the rule that this case established. Remember that the Courts say what the Constitution means, so, what does this case mean? What impact did it make? The paper will be due on April 19, 2020, 11:59 p.m.

Statement of Facts – 15 pts

Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/problems in the case study.

Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues/problems.

Identifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case study.

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems (i.e. Constitutional Questions) – 15 pts

Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems; includes all necessary mental calculations.

Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified; missing some necessary mental calculations.

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis of some of the identified issues; omits necessary mental calculations.

Recommendations on Effective Solutions/Strategies (I.e. Court Decisions) – 15 pts

Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and well- documented evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.

Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat one- sided argument; demonstrates little engagement with ideas presented.

Little or no action suggested and/or inappropriate solutions proposed to the issues in the case study.

Links to Course Readings and Additional Research (i.e. Reasoning of Decision/Bottom Line) – 15 pts

Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues/ problems and the strategic concepts studied in the course readings and lectures; supplements case study with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information.

Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between identified issues/problems and concepts studied in readings and lectures; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research.

Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.

Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines – 15 pts

Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still a clear presentation of ideas; lacks organization, format or length.

Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines.

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!