QSO 630 Retail Managers Research Paper

QSO 630 Retail Managers Research Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

QSO 630 Retail Managers Research Paper

QSO 630, Retail, Managers, Research, Paper

QSO 630 Retail Manager Interview Guidelines and Rubric As a supply manager committed to the efficiency of the supply chain operation, it is critical to be aware of strategies for improving productivity and quality. This may include collaborating and working with other people in the field to acquire knowledge of how other companies and industries have improved their practice.

For this retail manager interview assignment, you will create interview questions based on the topics below and submit a summary of your experience. These topics are used as critical elements in your final project assignment.

1. Inventory Management: a) Product Selling Season: Does the industry sell seasonal, steady, or hybrid products? b) Retail Inventory Strategy: Determine what inventory policy strategies the store has adopted for order quantity, safety stock, and reorder level. c) Impact of Manufacturer’s Production Strategy: What impact does the nature of selling have on the supply chain?
2. Consider domestic and foreign supply base, safety stock levels, reorder points, and demand variability. 2. Identify the production strategy for the company (continuous/mass production, batch production, or project-based).
3. Product Supply Contracts:
4. a) Production Strategy and Contracts: Identify the appropriate production strategy and contracts for the supply chain, such as daily deliveries, weekly deliveries, and monthly deliveries of supplies, and stable ordering vs. high variability.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

• Create three to four interview questions that will help you design your final project research proposal.
• Conduct the interview and summarize the information you obtain from your interview questions.
• In one to two paragraphs, describe your overall experience and personal perceptions of the conversations and information your received from the interview.

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your interview summary submission should be 1–2 pages in length. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA-style formatting.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Creation of Interview Questions

Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated application of supply chain management to the discussion of three to four new interview questions related to the final project topic

Discusses three to four new interview questions related to the final project topic

Discusses three to four new interview questions related to the final project topic, but discussion lacks detail or research

Does not discuss three to four new interview questions related to the final project topic

Summary Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated application of supply chain management to thoroughly summarize information obtained from the interview

Summarizes information obtained from the interview

Summarizes information obtained from the interview, but summary lacks detail or clarity

Does not summarize information obtained from the interview

Overall Experience and Personal Perceptions

Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated application of supply chain management to the reflection of overall experience and personal perceptions of information collected from the interview

Reflects on the overall experience and personal perceptions of information collected from the interview

Reflects on the overall experience and personal perceptions of information collected from the interview, but reflection lacks detail or clarity

Does not reflect on the overall experience and personal perceptions of information collected from the interview

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total 100%

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow QSO 630 Retail Managers Research Paper

QSO 630 Retail Managers Research Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!