The Wells Fargo Ethics Research Paper

The Wells Fargo Ethics Research Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

The Wells Fargo Ethics Research Paper

Wells, Fargo, Ethics, Research, Paper

Wells Fargo –  fake accounts fraud; $3 billion settlement with U.S. DOJ & SEC. If the hyperlink does not work, the URL is https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/21/wells-fargo-to-pay-3-billion-in-setting-criminal-and-civil-investigations-into-its-fraudulent-sales-practices.html

Assignment Instructions:

Create  a MINIMUM 13  slide PowerPoint presentation that includes:

Title slide with your name, course, date, school, title of presentation;

Agenda slide – This lists the key points covered in the PPT;

Content slides containing bullet points information with illustrations, diagrams, pictures, graphics etc., as appropriate to the slide’s content;

Speaker’s notes on each slide – either  text presented in the Speaker Notes section at the bottom of the slides or Audio through your Voice speaking (or both);

Identify  the company you selected; explain the company and its industry; provide the factual background of the problem; and clearly state the ethical dilemma presented by the situation.  There should be only ONE ethical dilemma. The company had two choices:  the act it chose and an alternative it did not do.

Identify and define at least one ethical framework that the company apparently employed in making their decision.  Note — Not “Should have used.” It is not acceptable to say they did not act ethically or did not use a framework. Analyze it.  Frameworks include utilitarianism, free market ethics, deontology, virtue ethics , etc., covered in your course readings.

Identify and define at least one ethical framework that the company should have used when the problem arose, and explain how to apply it for them to have reached a better result than actually happened. Be clear.

Identify and explain measures the company should implement to avoid this type of problem in the future.

Within your discussion include whether the company had a code of ethics or policy that seemed to apply to the situation, and if so, what went wrong with that?

Explain what  business leadership in any company can learn from this situation.

Have a conclusion that wraps up the key points.

Include a Reference slide with your sources listed in APA format. (NOTE: Sources must be cited in slides and speaker’s notes for direct quotes, specific facts and graphics, same as in a paper, per APA format. If you are doing audio speaker notes, you would mention the source in your speaking narrative.) (Reminder; we are using APA 7th Ed. format.)

Your PPT should have a professional slide background and graphics on each slide. (See rubric)

Submit your presentation here in the Assignments section, as a PowerPoint attachment.

Please compress your PPT  (zip file)  if necessary for uploading. There are several sources online to help you with compressing a PowerPoint presentation.

ABSOLUTELY NO PLAGIARISM, DUE 5/15/2020 AT 10AM EST. MINIMUM 3 SCHOLARLY APA RESOURCES.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Wells Fargo Ethics Research Paper

The Wells Fargo Ethics Research Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!