The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper

The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper

This is a suggested template for the status report. It can be adapted for a Leadership In Action Project, or a Consulting Case or XN Project

You do not have to follow this template precisely, but you must provide complete and clear information about your project and your progress. Simple fill-in responses to the prompts may not result in a thorough and useful status report. Use the template for ideas about what to include, to make your report more creative and effective.

This status report should provide you and your readers with an accurate summary of what you have accomplished, and it should outline your priorities for the next several weeks. 3-4 pages should be sufficient (not including title page and attachments and addenda).

Project Status Report Suggested Template

Your name

Title of Project

Date ( You are reporting on actions, events, and progress from the beginning of the semester through the current date)

Goal Statement:

(This is the statement you use to describe and introduce your Project; you have refined it and improved it, to communicate clearly with others what you wish to do, and why it is useful and necessary.)

Challenges getting started:

Were you prepared for the Master’s Capstone course and project?

What did you do before the semester started, to develop project ideas and be prepared?

How did you select and define your Project? What was your process?

Were there any delays? Why? How did you take action to overcome these delays? What did you learn about yourself and project management and time management?

Constituents (followers, colleagues, allies, stakeholders):

With whom are you interacting? With whom are you working? How, and how frequently? What is your role and relationship with each of your key constituents? Who views you as a leader? Or student researcher? Or in some other role? (Use correct names and other accurate information.)

Key Actions

What are your major accomplishments? What have you done?

(Case study research can include interactions with sponsors and sources, reports, articles, company data, interviews, and all fact-finding necessary for case analysis.)

(Action projects can include goal setting, recruiting, and all leadership interactions and management activities)

How do these actions compare to the actions you presented in your earlier Plan document?

What modifications and improvements have you made within your Project Plan? Why?

Research:

(Also see Constituent section.)

What academic research have you done about your research topic?

What field research have you done, or are you planning with the professor now, for interviews, questionnaires, observation, etc.?

What leadership and management theories are most relevant to you with your constituent interactions and your case understanding and analysis?

Leadership approaches:

How have you tried to use and practice leadership behaviors? What leadership models have you employed? With whom? What happened? What are you learning about leading, from your direct personal experience?

What concepts that you studied in the MSL program (in addition to leadership approaches) are you using yourself or observing in others?

Issues encountered:

What leadership challenges have you encountered? (This does not include management challenges such as time zone differences, etc.)

What concerns has the professor expressed in his feedback to date? Have you responded? How

What problems have you experienced? What problem solving have you done?

How have these issues required leadership solutions? What strategies have you employed?

Next steps:

Provide an updated timetable (simple text or graphic) and a more detailed list of action items that will be required between now and the completion of the semester. These action items refer specifically to your Project (not the other course assignments).

Two timetables may be necessary if the Capstone project is for your Master’s Degree and an employer or sponsor wants another timetable. See me for clarification if necessary.

Self assessment – Examine your own efforts. Include a paragraph to address the following questions.

Are you functioning at your potential?

What might be holding you back, or slowing your progress, or reducing your confidence? What do you want to do in the next several weeks to challenge yourself and practice leadership with others?

Addenda

You may attach a sample of the kinds of communication you are initiating for this project – a memo to your colleagues, a photo, a slide or chart you shared with followers or constituents, etc.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper

The Leadership Challenges Research Essay Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!