Group Favoritism in Social Life Discussion Questions

Group Favoritism in Social Life Discussion Questions

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

 

Group Favoritism in Social Life Discussion Questions
PROMPT #1: In-Group Favoritism
Generate a list of 3 examples of in-group favoritism that can be observed in social
life. For ONE of these discuss:
What favors or privileges do members of the group provide each other?
How do members of the in-group and out-group likely feel when favors or privileges
occur?
What are the unintended consequences of in-group favoritism at large as they relate
to your example?

ACTIVITY/PROMPT #2: Research on the Presentation of Self
Sometime this week initiate a 5-minute conversational interaction with someone who
is an acquaintance to you. During this interaction pay close attention to how
impression formation and impression management are present in the interaction.
After the interaction post a response here that tells us about your interaction and
how some of this week’s key concepts come alive in everyday life. Be sure to touch
on the following points:

What information did you gather about the acquaintance as you formed impressions
of them (e.g., physical appearance, social group membership, verbal or nonverbal
expressions, status symbols)?
How did you decide what information to share or not share about yourself in the
interaction?
What statuses did you take on, and what roles, characteristics, and attitudes are
important for playing them appropriately? (e.g., How did you act? What verbal or
nonverbal expressions did you use? What were you thinking about how you
presented yourself during the interactions?)
In what ways was your “presentation of self” influenced by the impressions you
formed of the other person?
To what extent was your successful performance dependent on the performance of
others?

ACTIVITY/PROMPT #3: “I Am”
As discussed in the lecture, generate at least 10 answers the complete the sentence
“I Am….” (in the lecture I say 20, but for purposes of the discussion board 10 is ok!)
Then, next to each answer, list the social institutions(s) that you see as related to
this identifier. If needed, revisit from past modules/reading what a social institution is.
Share your completed exercise on this thread along with your thoughts on how this
exercise helps us to understand the self as a social entity. Can you think of any
aspects of your identity that aren’t ties to a social institution in society?

Group Favoritism in Social Life Discussion Questions

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Group Favoritism in Social Life Discussion Questions

Group Favoritism in Social Life Discussion Questions

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!