US Portfolio and Reflection on DHSC
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
US Portfolio and Reflection on DHSC
US Portfolio and Reflection on DHSC, Bow Branch Placement Essay
Knowledge:
Understanding of organizational theories;
Ethical codes of conduct relevant to health and social care practice.
Skills
Ability to apply theory to practice;
Ability to use ‘Reflection on Action’ to analyses own, or observed, practice;
Ability to present material in a clear and coherent manner, which demonstrates good
literature searching and referencing skills;
4. Ability to undertake, and log the hours spent, on a work-based learning
placement.
Assessment
Assessment 001: Completion of a written portfolio on organizational theories and
your
work-based learning placement provider and a reflective report based on successful
completion and experiences of the work-based learning placement. Testing LOs K1,
K2, S1,S2 and S3. 2500 words as a guideline.
Assessment 002: Completion of 50 hours’ placement hours to be signed off by the
placement provider. Testing LO S4.
Your portfolio will be assessed against the specific learning outcomes identified
above You
should consider the following criteria as a guide to producing your work in addition to
the
university’s generic assessment criteria:
Details of the placement organization including the nature of its activities
Critical analysis of your experiences and performance within the organization in
relation
to the organizational theories in development of your skills, knowledge and
understanding
Critical evaluation of the role of others in the organization
Use of appropriate theoretical concepts includingUS Portfolio and Reflection on DHSC
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow US Portfolio and Reflection on DHSC
US Portfolio and Reflection on DHSC