SOC 600 UMASS Sociology Application and Controversy Paper

SOC 600 UMASS Sociology Application and Controversy Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

SOC 600 UMASS Sociology Application and Controversy Paper
“The social question”
Jane Addams’s Hull House
Du Bois’s Laboratory of Sociology
The Pittsburgh Survey
From the Roaring ‘20s to the Reactionary ‘80s
Reading: Lathrophttps://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/settlement-houses/hull-house-
sociological-laboratory-1894/; Morris (chapters 2-8); O’Connor (Chs. 1-6); ASA
History
Questions: Consider either sociology’s split from social work or the discontinuance of
projects like the Pittsburgh Survey. Do you consider it a loss for sociology or a step
in the right direction? How do you think the history of sociology might have differed if
this step had not been taken?
student comment: I think sociology’s split from social work is a step in the right
direction. Just as social work was described as “soft, amateur, feminized”, the split
seemed to be a passive separation caused by discrimination. However, I may argue
that even without such discrimination, the history of sociology would still have a
chapter of separation.
In my opinion, sociology and social work emphasize different aspects of social
science. Sociology is more about using rigorous, theoretically rooted knowledge to
understand and explain complex societies; social work is more about discovering
and solving practical problems with humanistic care. Both require large specialized
skills and knowledge different from each other. Therefore, it is necessary to develop

independently to become more specialized. Additionally, Social science needs both
neutrality and the power of care. Compared with mixing them and looking for an
internal balance, it’s not bad to separate them and let them complement each other.
I admit that the split could cause the gap between theory and practice, hindering the
original intention to jointly promote social progress. However, the emergence of
Applied Sociology makes up for this defect to a certain extent. From another
perspective, it is the split that brings a great opportunity for Applied Sociology.
No discipline is born perfect. Merged or split, both are in the process of development
and self-improvement.

SOC 600 UMASS Sociology Application and Controversy Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow SOC 600 UMASS Sociology Application and Controversy Paper

SOC 600 UMASS Sociology Application and Controversy Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!