WST 3324 Womanhood Experiences References Discussion Project
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
WST 3324 Womanhood Experiences References Discussion Project
Topic I picked: Campbell, C. (1999, November 10). Selling sex in the time of AIDS:
The Psycho-social context of condom use by sex workers on a Southern African
mine. Social Science & Medicine. Retrieved September 13, 2021,
from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953699003172 (Lin
ks to an external site.).The article I've chosen focuses on the day to day struggles
that women in Souther Africa face with sex work. The AIDS epidemic in Africa is
borderline-extreme and continues to be fueled through sex work in the community.
Sex work is a means of survival for these women and quitting it is not an option formany, this study is digging deeper into the organization and conditions that it takes
for these women. This study is also helping shine a light on what it takes every day
for these women to get past the trauma and risk involved in this field because
simplifying it to their "powerlessness" fails to take in the difficulty of what they do
(Campbell, 1999). I plan to use this source to dive into the bigger issue of the
dangers of sex work in minorities specifically, this is a well-respected author and a
topic that I am passionate about. I believe this is an easy argument to make and will
lead me to other strong sources.
Instructions: Remember that you are sticking with the same topic you selected for
your previous DS Project assignment. Your topic must relate to women’s health and
the environment. Remember, your topic is the one that you are researching for your
semester-long WST 3324 Desk Study (DS) Project. Utilize complete sentences. Be
as specific as possible and narrow your focus as needed. Your DS Project is
composed of several parts. Feel free to utilize Google Scholar and/or USF Library's
Research Tools. Second: Include, in formal APA style, a list of your Desk Study
References for at least ten (10) sources that you find on your topic and will use to
prepare your annotated bibliography, formal paper/report, and presentation. You are
required to include:
a complete title page
a complete references list that features at least ten (10) peer-reviewed scholarly
sources on your topic
your entire document must be in formal APA style
To find sources to use, you are to research your topic. Do this by reading peer-
reviewed scholarly journal articles that you find online (begin by using USF's library
site: https://lib.usf.edu/ (Links to an external site.)). Those articles should clearly
pertain to the topic you selected. Remember, all of your selected sources must be
formal, peer-reviewed scholarly academic journal articles. Books are acceptable,
too, of course. You may not use videos, audio clips, or other media. To find your
sources, please use USF’s library, other academic library sites, and/or Google
Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/ (Links to an external site.)).***All scholarly
sources that you use for your DS Project must be works that were originally
published in the last 10 years (originally published in 2010 or since).***WST 3324 Womanhood Experiences References Discussion Project
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow WST 3324 Womanhood Experiences References Discussion Project
WST 3324 Womanhood Experiences References Discussion Project