Ethical Decision Systems in Business Ethics Paper

Ethical Decision Systems in Business Ethics Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Ethical Decision Systems in Business Ethics Paper

Be sure to follow these instructions very carefully.

First, in order to meet academic honesty requirements, you must do your work completely on your own, independent of other people and outside sources. As you proceed, you should only have access to this document and to your class readings (Ghillyer), class notes, and classroom slides. Your goal is to integrate only this material into a thought-provoking piece using only your own analytical skills. Not following these guidelines, may result in failure on this project.

Writing Your Paper

Section 1—Your favorite ethical decision system

In an approximately 100-word paragraph, explain your favorite of the six ethical decision systems covered (based only on class discussion and class readings, no outside sources) and why you believe that it is the best for you. Convince me that it is the best ethical position. Write objectively, or, if you like, feel free to use first person narrative and personal examples or experiences. You do not need to compare your selection explicitly to the other five decision systems in your paragraph. My guide to the six theories is on Black Board.

Section 2—Answer case questions below from The Astros Cheated. Baseball Wanted Answers. So It Made a Deal. By Jared Diamond. Wall Street Journal, January 22, 2020. (Full text of article on BB)

Case Questions: Don’t repeat the questions but list your answers by the question numbers. Use the ethical theory you selected in Section 1 as a guide in answering the questions below.

What are the pros and cons of granting immunity? Answer the question taking into account various ethical frames of reference (e.g., deontology, utilitarianism, social contract theory, and virtue ethics).

The author of the article says that this immunity deal is a sign of MLB’s desire for a speedy and conflict-free investigation, the continuing power of the baseball players’ union, and the fragile state of the sport’s labor relations. For what reasons might these issues be complicating factors in the decision to grant immunity in this particular case?

The MLB Commissioner said the manager and assistant coaches knew that sign-stealing was going on and didn’t stop it. Therefore, the union could have successfully argued in a grievance hearing that the players didn’t know they were in the wrong, since their superiors never directly informed them, and even appeared to condone their behavior. From an ethical perspective, what is wrong with this classic example of “normalcy” (i.e., my boss is doing it so it must be OK) and/or “my boss told me to do it.”

Ethical Decision Systems in Business Ethics Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Decision Systems in Business Ethics Paper

Ethical Decision Systems in Business Ethics Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!