Pablo Neruda Research Methods and Rational Choice Theory
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Pablo Neruda Research Methods and Rational Choice Theory
Discussion 1: POETRY (I CHOSE Pablo Neruda who wrote “Ode to a large Tuna in the Market.”) (100 words)
What poet have you chosen and why? What are you interested in learning about your chosen poet?
Find a biography on your poet. Indicate the resource you used to find the biography and provide the MLA citation. *Refer to Purdue Owl to reference citation style.
Find one poem by your poet. What do you believe is the predominant theme in this poem? Indicate the resource you used to find the poem and provide the MLA citation. *Refer to Purdue Owl to reference citation style.
*Please reply to 2 other classmates post by 11:59 PM Saturday. *Please number the questions for your responses.
Discussion 2: RESEARCH METHODS (100 words)
Please explain the difference between Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs.
Give an example of one of the types.
Please post an original post
Discussion 3: CRIME (150 words) (150 205
Pablo Neruda Research Methods and Rational Choice Theory
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Pablo Neruda Research Methods and Rational Choice Theory
Pablo Neruda Research Methods and Rational Choice Theory