SOC 340 Chronic Cardiovascular Pathologies Discussion

SOC 340 Chronic Cardiovascular Pathologies Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

SOC 340 Chronic Cardiovascular Pathologies Discussion

I don’t know how to handle this Sociology question and need guidance.

One of the threads through all of Linda Hogan’s literature is that destroying the environment destroys people.  With that in mind, reflect on this week’s readings regarding pollution in Los Angeles County.

Write a personal narrative about your thoughts on the physical environment in our communities. Focus on the following questions, but do not JUST answer the questions. Take some time to reflect and then state your thoughts in full paragraph form.

To what extent were you aware of the drilling in LA County and the issues with the 710 corridor?
How does knowledge of the health impacts of drilling and the Port of Los Angeles affect your view of living in LA County?
What areas of LA County did you notice are most affected by pollution?
What do you think happens to people’s overall well-being in an area where there are many negative health outcomes due to environmental pollution?
To what extent do you think an unhealthy environment affects relationships among members of a community?.

SOC 340 Chronic Cardiovascular Pathologies Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow SOC 340 Chronic Cardiovascular Pathologies Discussion

SOC 340 Chronic Cardiovascular Pathologies Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!