Leadership and Change Reflection Discussion Paper

Leadership and Change Reflection Discussion Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Leadership and Change Reflection Discussion Paper

Michelle Rhee, as the leader of the DC Public Schools, was responsible for improving outcomes for students. She entered with what many would call an extreme approach to driving change for a district struggling with its outcomes. Regardless of whether you like her approach or not (not that you care, but I did not…), we can objectively analyze her leadership and effort to drive change for the “organization” to improve outcomes.

In this reflection, I’d like you to answer these questions in approximately ~3 pages:

What were the key factors to why Michelle Rhee felt like she needed to change the DC Public Schools? What were the factors she was using to understand if the organization’s performance before and after her changes? Were these the right factors of performance to focus on?

Using either Lewin’s or Kotter’s model, briefly walk through Rhee’s approach to change. Did she use elements that follow the model that you selected? If so, was she successful in following it? If not, how did she differ in approaching change?

Was Rhee successful in driving change?

Feel free to share any more thoughts you have on this case! 🙂

Leadership and Change Reflection Discussion Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Leadership and Change Reflection Discussion Paper

Leadership and Change Reflection Discussion Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!