Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper Solution

Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper

1. Evaluate the field. How do you feel about it? What do you feel are the pros and cons of the field? Do you feel like you could fit into the field as a professional? Why or why not? What was your reaction to the speakers and the presentation?
2. What would be your responsibilities? Your day-to-day tasks? How do these align (or not) with your current skill set, and how do these align (or not) with your interests?

OR

2. Research a condition this profession can treat. How do they treat it? What are the latest developments for this condition or treatment (i.e., technology, new discoveries)?

OR

Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper

3. What kind of demographics do this field or specialties in this field treat? What are the pros and cons of treating the general population, as opposed to a certain patient population? Which do you feel is best suited to you, and why?

Assignments will be graded based on the following:

Pass = Answered all questions, include in response thoughts on readings from the recommended list or cited sources that relate to the profession

Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper

Health Professionals Pre-Pharmacy Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!