Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

This week you will search the literature in databases for 3 articles within 5 years of today’s date, that are appropriate for your PICOT question. One article is a quantitative Download quantitative research study, one is qualitative Download qualitative and the third article is either a Clinical Practice Guideline Download Clinical Practice Guideline or a Systematic or Integrative Review Download Systematic or Integrative Review.

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Ensure that you are using the approved week 2 assignment topic list as all of these topics have guidelines associated with them and many articles can be found.

Read the first few sentences of methods section of your articles to assess what type of article you have

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Critique each article using the appropriate Appraisal Forms. The form takes you through a reflection on WHY was research done-HOW was research done and WHAT was found.

Review rubric carefully to ensure all questions have been answered. Points are deducted for articles not loaded or if incorrect type of article submitted. The quantitative and qualitative articles will be used in week 6 Article Critique therefore if you are unsuccessful with article selection in week 4 you will need to find a new article by the end of week 5 with the help of the librarian or your faculty in selecting a new article to use in week 6.

All answers to questions for week 4 are brief and only 1- 2 sentences. Example: What group produced the guideline? Answer: US Preventive Services Task Force develops recommendations about preventive services based on a review of high-quality scientific evidence and publishes its recommendations on its website and or in a peer reviewed journal

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Avoid any copying and pasting 7 or more words of content from the article or another source. Use your own words to create your answers. APA is not required for content of answers on template

APA is only required for your citation on the template.

You must submit the research study articles along with your assignment

Here are the links to assist with APA and searches:

APA Guide and Template

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Guide

A to Z Database List (for this assignment, the CINAHL+, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health, and Academic Search Complete are recommended.)

Sometimes students have a difficult time locating clinical practice guidelines. If you have googled the term “clinical practice guidelines + your topic” and haven’t found anything, these additional resources may help make the search easier:

https://libguides.uta.edu/guidelines (Links to an external site.)

https://guidelines.ecri.org/ (Links to an external site.)

Databases for Systematic Reviews:

https://www.cochrane.org/ (Links to an external site.)

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ (Links to an external site.)

https://www.tripdatabase.com/

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!