Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems
Hi, please read and respond to peers in 75 words or more with credible references.
Peer 1:
informative post. SNOMED-CT is essential for recording and sharing clinical data across IT systems and organizations. Beyond the requirements of meaningful use, SNOMED CT can be used to capture family history, allergies, and past medical history. It can be mapped to other international standards, such as ICD-9 and ICD-10, to better facilitate semantic interoperability or the meaningful sharing of patient information electronically (Mason, 2018). SNOMED-CT is organized into four sets:
Concepts- unique teams and codes.
Descriptions-multiple descriptions, each of which is a synonym of the original concept.
Relationships-SNOMED uses relationships between concepts to provide formal definitions and organization.
Reference Sets- designation of language preferences for specific terms, mapping to other code systems, and a collection of concepts relevant to a medical specialty (Intelligent Medical Objects, 2018).
REFERENCE
Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems
Intelligent Medical Objects. (April 2022 6). SNOMED CT 101: A guide to the international terminology system. https://www.imohealth.com/ideas/article/snomed-ct-…
Mason, Cheryl. (2018) “SNOMED CT and the EHR: Why Should a HIM Professional Care?” Journal of AHIMA. https://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=302574#.Yg7XBlXMKM8
Peer 2:
Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems
Great points. Some also believe that SNOMED CT is widely used in EHR over ICD-10 and CPT because it is the most comprehensive, multilingual clinical terminology in the world, encompassing more than 340,000 concepts (Mason, 2018). SNOMED CT is superior to ICD-10 for clinical representations due to its
focus on clinical concepts and multi-axial structure. While ICD-10 is designed as a hierarchical statistical classification system, SNOMED CT is represented by multiple levels of granularity such as body structure, clinical finding, event, procedure, social context, and substance. The scope of SNOMED CT covers
relevant areas such as problems, diagnosis, organisms, pharmaceutical descriptions, and anatomic areas that enable clinicians to analyze detail in EHR (Mason, 2018). On the other hand, ICD-10 and CPT serve a different purpose as a disease classification system for reporting and billing.
References
Mason, C. (2018). SNOMED CT and the EHR: Why Should a HIM Professional Care? Journal of AHIMA (89)8, 48–50.
Peer 3: HCAD 640 Discussion: Activity-Based Costing (100words minimum)
Good post.
ABC approach will allow organizations to be more transparent with the true cost of services and procedures provided. This will allow patients to know the true cost of their care and give them the ability to shop around if they choice. (O’Dowd, 2021).
References
O’Dowd, M. (2021, March 22) Do you know your ABCs? Activity-Based Costing
for Healthcare Organizations
https://blog.sageintacct.com/blog/abcs-for-healthcare-organizations
Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems
Recording and Sharing Clinical Data Across IT Systems