Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper
Your assignment should include your name and student number, be a maximum of 6 pages, and it MUST include in-text citations as well as a reference list at the end of your assignment. You can use paragraphs/full sentences or point form to answer each question. Remember that the assignment is worth a significant value (20% toward your course total) and therefore you will be evaluated on the completeness of your answers. You should therefore spend time to ensure that you’ve provided a complete and robust answer, and include at least 5 references based on your own independent research. (The textbook, recommended websites listed in the assignment, and on-line class notes do not contribute to these 5 references).
In completing the assignment, be sure to provide reference sources for your information to avoid plagiarism by using a standard citation system as described in the following:
https://libguides.lib.umanitoba.ca/citingandwriting
http://tim.thorpeallen.net/Courses/Reference/Citations.html
Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper
Note that scientific style in writing does not include quotations. You must summarize technical information in your own words.
Some useful resources (in addition to those found in Unit 2 on-line lecture notes) as a starting point in your research include:
Course Materials – Video lecture; Chapter 5 from textbook
Feedback Loops – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inVZoI1AkC8&feature=emb_logo
Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper
What Are Climate Change Feedback Loops? – theguardian.com/environment/2011/jan/05/climate-change-feedback-loops
The Carbon Cycle – http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/CarbonCycle/
Three Steps to Cut Your Carbon Footprint 60% Today | Jackson Carpenter | TEDxAsheville
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=145&v=63hAHbkzJG4&feature=emb_logoThe Cheeseburger Footprint – https://vimeo.com/4709524
Nitrogen Cycle – https://youtu.be/QltEXnglmYA
Phosphorus in aquatic ecosystems – https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/freshwater-quality-monitoring/publications/phosphorus-aquatic-ecosystems.html
Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper
Biogeochemical Cycles and Links to Environmental Impacts Paper