Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper Solution

Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper

Overview: In week 1, you selected a topic and developed a research question for that topic. Then, you developed a data gathering instrument to measure the question either quantitatively or qualitatively. Now that you have had the opportunity to read how scholarly methodologies are written, you will write a condensed 3–4-page methodology section for your

research question using the required headings from the University of the Cumberland’s Dissertation Handbook.  Like we discuss in class, each university has unique parameters for what they expect in chapter 3, so you may see papers from other universities that look slightly different. The importance here is to focus on the content, not necessarily the

organization. This assignment will help determine your readiness to write a full-length chapter three.

Directions:

Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper

Review your notes from class on the different methodologies and instruments used to measure. Also, review the examples:

Approaches Expectations.docx Approaches Expectations.docx – Alternative Formats

Meets Expectations.docx Meets Expectations.docx – Alternative Formats

Exceeds Expectations.docx Exceeds Expectations.docx – Alternative Formats

Finally, review the rubric:  Rubric for Methodology.docx Rubric for Methodology.docx – Alternative Formats

2. Develop a 3–4-page (more is fine) methodology section that includes the following:

Introduction

Research Paradigm (qualitative or quantitative) Notes: Choose Qualitative or Quantitative based on what methodology you plan to use for your actual dissertation. You may not choose to do both qualitative and quantitative (mixed-methods)

Research- or project- Design

Sampling Procedures and

Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper

Data Collection Sources

Statistical Tests Summary (quantitative) OR Data Organization Plan (Qualitative). Notes:  If you chose a quantitative research paradigm, you must choose a quantitative statistical test summary option in this section. If you chose a qualitative research paradigm, you must choose the qualitative organization plan option in this section.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper

Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!