GEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion Essay

GEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion EssayGEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

GEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion Essay

  Final Paper Progress [WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Prepare: In preparation for this discussion forum, make a list of what you learned most throughout the process of researching your final essay topic, as well as difficulties you may have encountered along the way.

Reflect: Think about what you have learned in the development of your research findings on the global societal issue you chose in the Week 1 discussion forum, your proposed solution and its ethical outcomes, and share with your classmates why this specific issue requires further research.

Write: For this discussion, you will address the following prompts:

Identify the global societal issue you have chosen to research for your Final Paper, an argumentative essay, and explain why further research on this topic is important.

Provide a clear and concise thesis statement that includes a solution to the global societal issue (see Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.) for assistance).

Explain how this global societal issue impacts a specific population.

Locate a peer-reviewed scholarly source and provide statistical data that you found surprising on the topic. For sports betting, this might mean https://nikel.co.id/como-puedo-jugar-en-casinos-online-sin-social/ a minimum stake or odds are needed to release the bonus.

GEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. Min deposit to claim your bonus is USD http://vozhispananews.com/best-slot-machine-casinos-in-las-vegas/ To withdraw, you must beat wagering requirements by B 40x. With such technologies, https://teyasilk.com/how-to-play-online-poker-in-new-york/ the improvement has limitless possibility.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. With these methods, withdrawals may take between two and five https://myhomes.tv/new-hotel-casino-on-fremont-street/ days.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. The hotel resort is open twenty-four hours a day, and you can contact them by phone https://www.siliconvalleycloudit.com/harrahs-joliet-casino-phone-number/ toll-free at. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow GEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion Essay

GEN 499 Unemployment Case Stud Discussion Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!