Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper Solution

Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper

Read the summary of the case Daughtry v. Ashe on page 369 of the Cheeseman textbook (Under “Critical Legal Thinking Cases”) and in an original post explain to the class whether or not you think the jeweler in this case made an express warranty or simply offered an opinion with respect to the quality of the diamonds in the bracelet. In an original post explain your opinion on the following questions:

Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper

1.  Do you think a jeweler’s evaluation of a diamond is an opinion or are the standards objective enough that all jewelers would give the same diamond the same quality rating?
2.  Since opinions do not create warranties, (a car dealer for example can say, “This is the best car on the lot.” and no warranty is created because that is just his opinion) if Daughtry sues the jeweler for breach of warranty, who do you think will win the case?
3.  What should Daughtry have done differently to better protect himself?

Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper

Express Warranties in Jewelry Case Study Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!