Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey Gurgler’s Discussion Essay
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey Gurgler’s Discussion Essay
Every student has been assigned a published paper to read and to summarize. You can find the paper on internet. So, download the paper, read it, and write a summary report
day. The presentations will start immediately after the midterm
break. (Monday, March 21st 2022)
Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Published: 8/2006, Volume: 61, Issue: 4 |
MALCOLM BAKER, JEFFREY WURGLER
Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey
- A short (1 – 2 paragraph) post in which you discuss:
How do you think Canada should produce their electricity over the next 50 years?
Explain what you think is the biggest challenge for Canada to switch their electricity supply sources to your proposed sources.
What would be the most likely environmental consequences of switching Canada’s electricity to your proposed sources?
- Respond (“Reply”) to TWO different classmates’ posts. Your responses should be substantive. Do not just agree with your classmate’s post. Examples of substantive response posts often include at least one of the following:
Tell the poster something new that you learned from their post, and why that new knowledge is important to you.
Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey
Gently point out something that is incorrect in your classmate’s post, and use facts to explain why your classmate is incorrect.
Disagree politely with a classmate’s opinion, and articulate what facts have led you to have an opinion that is different from theirs.
you will do part one fir now and then I will send you part two
Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey
Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey