Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper Solution

 Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

 Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

I’m working on a business question and need guidance to help me learn.

Your author notes on page 117: “in the complex project landscape effective integration requires management approaches that allow for a flexible creative and adaptive approach by the project team in response to the changing characteristics of the project, organization, and cultural environment and the dynamics

of the organization”. This week you learned about process groups used in the project management lifecycle. In your experience, are all these deliverables necessary? Provide two deliverables that all projects, regardless of methodology, should leverage and two deliverables that may not be necessary and why?

Part 2:

Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

Choose an Agile framework and a project that can be completed using the Agile framework and answer the following:

Describe the model to include a pictorial review of the process

Describe the project

Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

Why do you feel this model is better for this type of project?

What would be the impact of completing the project using a different approach?

Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

Scrum Methodology Discussion Case Study Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!