Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

It doesn’t have to be a video just please create a power point 8 slides with a reference slide

Introduction

Discussion forums allow students the opportunity to analyze and discuss project management topics with classmates and the instructor. They are an opportunity for sharing insights and experiences within project management and are relative to the readings, other weekly course material, and the Unit Learning

Outcomes. Please review the Learning Outcomes and the Directions prior to posting your response to the discussion prompt below.

Unit Learning Outcomes

Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

Examine the importance of time management within project management.

Assemble project teams to understand the importance of team collaboration.

Examine the various key aspects of time management.

Analyze the baseline project within this course.

Directions

Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

There are many components to time management in project management. After reviewing the material for this week, select a topic from the time management chapter (Chapter 6 of Mulcahy’s book) and create a 2-4-minute video on the topic of the importance of time management. Be sure to note the key concepts within the topic and explain why the topic is important.

In addition to discussing your topic, identify a relevant source over your topic and cite the source in your video. By finding a referenced source, you are enhancing the learning experience by searching for another source of information on the topic. Please ensure you are using a source that is peer reviewed to ensure accuracy of information (select peer-reviewed journal articles in the Park Library). Use APA formatting when providing citations.

Your video presentation should be in the format of an executive summary (must contain verbiage and bullet points to name the key points). Note that you should create the video with closed captioning enabled (by using a YouTube account) and post the YouTube link to the discussion post. After the videos are posted, actively engage in a

Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

Park Business Presentation Discussion Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!