The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion
Change the subject line of your posting and write your first name and the specific website of your posting. When responding to classmates’ postings type reply to and their first name. Discussion participation due dates (Please do not post before the first day of the week)
By Thursday, make your initial discussion board posting
By Saturday, make one response to a classmate’s posting. NOTE: make a response to a posting that does not yet have a response. DO NOT make a second response to a posting that already has one response.
By Sunday, answer professor’s questions re: your posting
The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion
By Monday, return to your discussion and reply to classmates who responded to your posting
Your third writing assignment will be to write a quick start guide. This discussion topic is designed to help you become more familiar with what a quick start guide is and what its function is in technical writing. This must be the SAME WEBSITE as WA2.
To learn about quick start guides, please examine the three resources provided in Content in week 3:
Please peruse the following three articles on quick start guides:
Quick Reference Guides: The Poetry of Technical Writing
Technical Writing Tips: The 80/20 Rule
The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion
You might also benefit from looking at the Sample Quick Start Guides in Content in week 3. While these quick start guides are longer than the one you will be writing, they present different strategies for incorporating text and images to accommodate their users. Your quick start guide, WA3, must not be longer than ONE PAGE. (Plus, title page of course)
Then answer the following questions. Your answers should be 2-3 sentences for each question. DO NOT COPY QUESTIONS but DO NUMBER ANSWERS:
Most quick start guides are one page long. They have to be one page so that the user can look at them at a glance. What are some of the challenges to reducing a set of instructions of, for example, 3-4 pages into one page? Support your answer with a properly formatted and placed APA citation and include the source in a reference list at the end of your posting.
How does the 80/20 rule relate to the usefulness of quick start guides? Support your answer with a properly formatted and placed APA citation and include the source in a reference list at the end of your posting.
In your experience, when you purchase a product or a new piece of software, do you tend to use the user manual more, or do you tend to use the quick start guide more? Why?
Sample Quick start guides the following quick start guides are more than one page long. However, the strategies the companies use in these quick start guides can be helpful for you as you write your quick start guide for writing assignment #3.
The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion
The Poetry of Technical Writing Business Discussion