Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

Description

In your analysis of this case, you must ensure that you include the following:

• An introductory paragraph and brief summary of what this case study is about.
• An explanation this case project risk management (provide at least three benefits), providing details as to how risk management was conducted in the case.
• Explain the components of a robust Risk Management Plan and Risk Register and discuss how risk management was conducted in this case.
• A short paragraph as conclusion.

All submissions must be done through the online Turnitin portal in Moodle. Percentage similarity MUST NOT exceed 15%.

Submission Instructions

Read the Case Study associated with the specific unit carefully, then proceed as follows:

11. Prepare a response that is 750 words or maximum of 3 pages double-spaced (excluding title page and reference page) and should follow APA format and referencing style.
12. While there is no “formula” for analyzing case studies, the following guidelines are recommended:
13. Define the outcomes and objectives for your analysis. What questions are you trying to answer and what issues are you trying to resolve?
14. Rapidly skim through the case study and get a sense for how the case study has been structured
15. Read through the case study with paper and pencil and make notes as you go along

Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

11. Structure the information in the case study: this is the key step.
12. Whilst addressing the case questions, think of the information given in the case study as “raw data” that you have gathered to help you answer the questions and resolve the issues in Step 2a above.
13. You need to structure this information in order to resolve the issues. Here are some useful dimensions along which you can structure the given information chronologically:
14. evolution of the industry in which the enterprise operates (e.g., changes in technology, customer needs, competitive landscape)

xvi. evolution of strategy – business, technology, and market – of the enterprise

xvii. evolution of technology (including manufacturing), product platforms, and product lines of the enterprise

xviii. the technology, product, and process development process within the enterprise

xix. growth (or decline) of the enterprise with respect to market share, revenues, costs, profits, etc.

1. organizational structure of the enterprise

xxi. key decisions made at different stages in the life of enterprise, and the drivers for these decisions

14. Make extensive use of figures, tables, trees, etc. to shape your thinking during the structuring process.
15. Draw conclusions, answer questions, resolve issues, and make recommendations using the struct

Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

Doctrine Behind Risk Management Case Study Report

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!