State Capital Budgeting Business Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
State Capital Budgeting Business Discussion
#1e) Capital budgeting techniques aid business with investment decision making. Many approaches can be used, with some being more advanced than others. Use the 3 topics below to form a 300-word minimum discussion
- a) Describe the payback period approach to capital budgeting.
- b) Explain 1 advantage and 1 disadvantage of the technique.
- State Capital Budgeting Business Discussion
c)Explain why it would be wise for a financial manager to learn advanced capital budgeting techniques.
#2d) For an organization of your choice, suggest two metrics that could be used to analyze the effectiveness of their overall digital marketing effort. Include your rationale for why those should be used within that organization. Think about why metrics are so important to digital marketing. 250 word minimum
#3g) Do you think income inequality in the United States is just a natural consequence of the free-market economy and not a problem, or is income inequality a social problem that needs to be addressed politically, economically, or socially? Explain. 200 word minimum
#4g) Do you believe people are born with the ability to persuade or influence others, or can people learn and improve in their ability to persuade others? Which category do you fit into more and why? Use a real-life example in your discussion. 200 word minimum
State Capital Budgeting Business Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow State Capital Budgeting Business Discussion
State Capital Budgeting Business Discussion