MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

PREPARATION

Review the coaching session between Mike and Joe in Chapters 7–10 of the Whitmore text and reflect on your own coaching sessions in weeks 2 and 4 before beginning this assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS

Conduct a similar coaching session with a colleague, friend, or family member. The topic of the coaching session may be anything that your coachee would like to discuss. You may choose to record this session, with your coachee’s permission, so you can go back and critically analyze the entire conversation.

Respond to the following:

Explain how the coachee was selected.

Apply coaching strategies to establish trust and rapport.

Discuss how you established trust and rapport with this individual.

Apply the steps of the GROW model to help the coachee create goals, assess reality, determine realistic options, and to establish will.

Detail how you applied each step of the model during your coaching session.

Include some of the questions you asked in each step of the GROW model.

Identify any unexpected challenges with the process.

MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

Analyze any challenges that you faced during the coaching session.

How did you demonstrate a true interest in this person and seek to understand their point of view?

Compare and contrast your experiences as a coach with your experience as the coachee in weeks 2 and 4.

What were the similarities and the differences?

Your paper should have 6–8 pages of content (excluding the cover page and reference section). Use the APA Manual (linked in the Resources). Since this paper is a personal reflection, it is acceptable to use first person for this assignment

Whitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for performance: Growing human potential and purpose: The principles and practice of coaching and leadership (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey.

Chapter 6, “The Sequence of Questioning,” pages 53–57.

Chapter 7, “Goal Setting,” pages 58–66.

Chapter 8, “What Is Reality?” pages 67–78.

Chapter 9, “What Options Do You Have?” pages 79–84.

Chapter 10, “What Will You Do?” pages 85–92.

MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

MHA5042 Coaching Sessions Trust and Rapport

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!