Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

Important note regarding word limit requirements:

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

During times of crisis, such as mass shootings and gun violence good communication among public health experts, through the media to the public is of important. Therefore, the news media play a critical role in disseminating knowledge to public.

However, on the other hand according to Breland and Colleagues (2017), traditional methods of communication for public health researchers, such as conference presentations and journal publications, have a restricted reach.

Public health researchers, on the other hand, can use social media to modify messages and disseminate their work to whichever audience they desire. Social media posts can also supplement traditional coverage by assisting with

press release distribution and providing conversation forums. To the degree that public health researchers use social media effectively and efficiently, it offers a once-in-a-lifetime chance to directly contact the public, impact public

conversation, and influence policy (Breland et al, 2017). Therefore, social media is the most effective way to disseminate knowledge because it is the most popular way people communicate.

Reference

Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

Breland, J. Y., Quintiliani, L. M., Schneider, K. L., May, C. N., & Pagoto, S. (2017). Social Media as a Tool to Increase the Impact of Public Health Research. American journal of public health, 107(12), 1890–1891. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304098

Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be

included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that

presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.

Ask a probing question.

Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.

Offer and support an opinion.

Validate an idea with your own experience.

Make a suggestion.

Expand on your colleague’s posting.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class

To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.

REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.

References

American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

Public Health Communication During a Crisis Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!