Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Research suggests that individuals with health insurance in this country have better access to health-care services and enjoy better health-care outcomes than those who do not.
This does not mean, however, that all individuals with health insurance receive “equal treatment.” Medicaid recipients (people who are financially indigent) often complain that although they have public insurance, many private providers refuse to accept them as patients.’
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Patients enrolled in managed care suggest that their treatment options are more limited than traditional private insurance because of the use of gatekeepers, required authorizations, and queuing. Some individuals, with lower cost
insurance plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, suggest that high out-of-pocket costs for copayments and deductibles continue to restrict their choice to access needed care.
Assignment:
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Using the ethical principle of justice, determine whether health care in this country should be a right or a privilege. Are the uninsured and the insured “unequal” that should be treated according to their differences?
Does the type of health insurance that one has also create a system of unequal? If so, are the unequal being treated according to their differences?
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Are Some People More Equal Than Others?
Are Some People More Equal Than Others?