Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Qualitative Research & Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Content analysis is a research tool used to determine the presence of certain words, themes, or concepts within some given qualitative data (i.e., text). Using content analysis, researchers can quantify and analyze the presence, meanings and relationships of such certain words, themes, or concepts. Sources of data could be from interviews, open-ended questions, field research notes, conversations, or literally any occurrence of communicative language (such as books, essays, discussions, newspaper headlines, speeches, media, historical documents).

There are two general types of content analysis: conceptual analysis and relational analysis. Conceptual analysis determines the existence and frequency of concepts in a text. Relational analysis develops the conceptual analysis further by examining the relationships among concepts in a text. Each type of analysis may lead to different results, conclusions, interpretations, and meanings. Advantages of Content Analysis:

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Directly examines communication using text, allows for both qualitative and quantitative analysis, provides valuable historical and cultural insights over time and allows a closeness to data. Disadvantages of Content Analysis: can be extremely time consuming, is subject to increased error, particularly when relational analysis is used to attain a higher level of interpretation, Is often devoid of theoretical base, or attempts too liberally to draw meaningful inferences about the relationships and impacts implied in a study and Is inherently reductive, particularly when dealing with complex texts (Columbia Public Health, 2021).

Qualitative research is well suited to explore, describe, and explain how changes in policies and practice during the pandemic could be adapted and implemented while addressing healthcare professionals’ and patients’ voices regarding their needs, concerns, and preferences. Qualitative research can also provide insight into how individuals and groups perceive and deal with these changes, and better inform a unique and targeted approach to mitigate the negative impacts on society. Qualitative research is indeed complimentary to the other types that are currently being conducted, and equally important to ensure an understanding of the various contexts and inform how we respond to the pandemic in the most appropriate way.

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

A literature and policy review to explore the lived experiences of different occupational groups of Health Care Workers (HCW) on the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic physicians, nurses, trainees, and nonclinical essential workers in relation to ongoing COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. Finally, we discuss policy and legal considerations to improve the state of HCP COVID-19 vaccine uptake as the pandemic progresses (Gur-Arie et al., 2021). The principal objective of M analysis was to investigate the intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 and its influencing factors among HCWs and provide the rationale for the promotion of COVID-19 vaccine (Luo et al., 2021).

Reference

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Columbia Public Health. (2021, September 30). Content analysis. Population HealthMethods. Retrieved November 25, 2021, from https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/content-analysis. 

Gur-Arie, R., Berger, Z., & Rubinstein Reiss, D. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine uptake through the lived experiences of health care personnel: Policy and legal considerations. Health Equity, 5(1), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2021.0027

Luo, C., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Zheng, D., Shao, L., Jin, J., & He, Q. (2021). Intention to covid-19 vaccination and associated factors among health care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. American Journal of Infection Control, 49(10), 1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.06.020

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.

Ask a probing question.

Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.

Offer and support an opinion.

Validate an idea with your own experience.

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

Qualitative Research and Content Analysis Discussion Essay Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!