- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project Solution
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
Due: Thursday, November 21
Min. Length: 1 ½ pages. Times New Roman. 12 pt. font. MLA format.
For this self-review assignment, I would like you to generously and critically read your own research project. Please keep in mind that this is the end of the quarter and, therefore, the end of the road for revisions. Hence, your comments are crucial! Quote from your essay (your own words) and cite it. You may compose this as an essay, or a letter to yourself.
Some things to consider as you write your review:
Do you state a clear and concise topic and inquiry? What are they?
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
What types of sources are you using? What is the common thread linking these sources?
Do you introduce the author(s) and the respective piece of work before discussing it?
How are you using each source?
From which source is a claim being countered? How is the claim countered?
Are there sufficient number of quotes (at least one per source)?
How are the quotes/paraphrases integrated within the text? Do they enhance or inhibit the inquiry? Are they analyzed?
Is there a discussion following the research? What is included in this discussion?
How do you conclude the essay?
Where are you most interested? Explain.
Where do you need more information? Why?
Self-Review ENG / Ragio
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
Due: Thursday, November 21
Min. Length: 1 ½ pages. Times New Roman. 12 pt. font. MLA format.
For this self-review assignment, I would like you to generously and critically read your own research project. Please keep in mind that this is the end of the quarter and, therefore, the end of the road for revisions. Hence, your comments are crucial! Quote from your essay (your own words) and cite it. You may compose this as an essay, or a letter to yourself.
Some things to consider as you write your review:
Do you state a clear and concise topic and inquiry? What are they?
What types of sources are you using? What is the common thread linking these sources?
Do you introduce the author(s) and the respective piece of work before discussing it?
How are you using each source?
From which source is a claim being countered? How is the claim countered?
Are there sufficient number of quotes (at least one per source)?
How are the quotes/paraphrases integrated within the text? Do they enhance or inhibit the inquiry? Are they analyzed?
Is there a discussion following the research? What is included in this discussion?
How do you conclude the essay?
Where are you most interested? Explain.
Where do you need more information? Why?
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
Self-Review ENG Regio Research Project
