Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment Solution

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Running Head: PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS DEBATE 1

PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS DEBATE 4

Respond to classmates

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

In any forums provide a total of 2 replies of at least 150 words. Respond to each student

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate

Peter

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

It’s been a problem in sports for a while, first was the ability to cheat your opponent and now it seems to be the ability to grab an advantage with PEDs. After watching the presentation from John Gleaves about the two different aspects of the PED debate, I still find myself on the side of being against PEDs. While I can see the argument for them, I just cant seem to see that the athletes that dont want to or are morally opposed to them are ok with this.

The choice to use PEDs is exactly that, a choice. For the game of sport to make things all equal and morally fair, it should be that no one should have to use PEDs if they choose not to. When I was younger I had family in the bodybuilding industry. There were two divisions, professional (drugged) and natural (no drugs) if there is such a group or need for athletes to completely do PEDs, I suggest they make their own divisions in sports. I know this isnt ideal for like professional sports but for track and field and individual events that could be a possibility. While I dont see this happening, I think that this is the only fair way to separate them. I cant force individuals to potentially harm their bodies to keep up with athletes that are doing things that are illegal.

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

In our society with every changing technology, it is up to the boards and the commissioners of specific sports  to guide them in to a future that equates to a fair fight/playing field to everyone. There will always be arguments for each side, but I feel there needs to be a morale compass on the ability of pure sport and not just personal growth or artificial ability.

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate

Hubb

I truly participating in discussions and debates about these specific topics.  My personal opinion and view is that the answer to this question is dependent on the specific question and cannot be generalized.  Let me explain a bit.

Let’s first consider the use of performance enhancing drugs.  The conflict theory in sociology states that “tensions and conflicts arise when resources, status and power are unevenly distributed among groups in society” (Crossman, 2019).  When you consider that definition and think about how it applies to the use of performance enhancing drugs, then deviance in this case is out of control.  You have a group of professional athletes who all possess a high skill level and if on a level playing field, would get to compete with each other for roster spots, salaries and championships.  However, when some in that select group begin to cheat the system and make the playing field unlevel, it creates conflict and tensions.

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Marx argued that the conflict theory created a wide gap between the wealthy and the working class citizens (Crossman, 2019).  To argue against my point earlier, I will say that in the case of athletes committing crimes and carrying unlawful weapons it is not accurate to say that it is a deviance problem in sports as much as a deviance issue in society.  Individuals

of all backgrounds are guilty of committing crimes, so to say that type of deviance is out of control in sports would be irresponsible.  Do we hear about those situations more because of the individual involved?  Of course we do.  But if you consider the percentages of professional athletes who are in trouble with the law and compare it to that of the “working class”

then I think you would see the athletes are not in trouble more often.

I guess I answered the question by not really answering the question, but I would say that in some instances deviance in sports is a huge problem.  However in other situations that we are told are out of control in sports, the truth may be misconstrued a little.

Reference

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Crossman, A. (2019, July 3). Understanding Conflict Theory.  Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/conflict-theory-3026622.  Last accessed on November 20, 2019.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

Performance Enhancing Drugs Debate Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!