Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

Ethics Assignment

The purpose of this exercise is to explore ethics and decision making within organizations.

Case Overview

George Stein, a college student working for Eastern Dairy, is suddenly faced with an ethical

dilemma. George has very little time to think about his choices – less than a minute. On the one

hand, he can do what Paul tells him to do, and his shift can go home on time. However, he finds

it tough to shake the gross mental image of all those innocent kids drinking milkshakes

contaminated with pulverized maggots. If he chooses instead to go against Paul, what would the

guys say? He can almost hear their derisive comments already….

Assignment Guidelines

Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

1) Provide an overview of the case (1 paragraph). Name this section ‘Identification of Dilemma’and address the following:

1. What do we know about George? Paul?
2. What is the overall ethical dilemma?
3. Who can be impacted by the dilemma (people and/or groups)?

2) Provide a brief overview of 2 Frameworks (Approaches) to Managerial Ethics (2 paragraphs

). Name this section ‘Ethical Frameworks’. Name each sub-section after the ethical

frameworks you choose.

1. Choose from: Utilitarian, Self-Interest (Ego), Rights, Justice,

Religious/Deontological, or Social/Cultural.

1. The textbook, and presentations provide brief explanations for the approaches above. Expand

on these with external sources.

1. This section of your paper should not reference the milkshake case. Instead

focus on what you’ve learned regarding each ethical approach.

3) Provide outcomes to this ethical dilemma (1 paragraph). Name this section ‘Evaluation of

Ethical Dilemma’. Address the following in this section

1. Based on what you’ve learned about George from the case, which framework

(from the two you’ve explained in the previous section) do you believe will guide

George in this situation? Why do you believe he will go this direction?

1. There’s no right/wrong answer choice, so I won’t grade this on your ability to

choose a particular ethical framework. Instead, I’m more concerned with your

ability to describe why you chose the a

Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

Ethics and Decision Making Within Organizations

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!