Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
The minimum requirement is that you make at least three posts (any combination of replies and comments) before midnight on Sunday.
The comments/replies you post on Perusall will be graded. You will receive an overall grade of 0, 1, 2, or 3 on the assignment. Your grade is based on several factors. The primary ones are:
The quality of your top three comments/replies. The goal is for you to demonstrate a thorough reading and insightful interpretation of the passage. In practice, this will require a comment length closer to a paragraph than a one line comment.
The distribution of your comments/replies. If all your comments/replies are on a single paragraph or section of the readings, your grade might be slightly reduced. We’ll be looking for your comments/replies to be distributed across the entire reading.
Prescriptive and Descriptive Methods Discussion
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
Review Questions for Mid-term
For Part I of the mid-term exam, there will be 4-5 questions from the list below.
What are the differences between stochastic and deterministic models? What are the
differences between prescriptive and descriptive models?
List three areas/fields where linear programming and related optimization techniques are
commonly used. Give an example for each.
Name 3 common rules for modeling.
What are the 4 components of a mathematical program? What makes it a linear program?
What are the different types of possible solutions to a linear program?
Briefly explain the intuition behind the graphical approach of solving simple LPs.
Briefly explain the essence of the simplex method (i.e. how does it work?).
Briefly explain the meaning of a dual/shadow price. How can you obtain the dual prices
by formulating the dual problem?
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
How do you go back to the standard/canonical form for a LP when:
You have an inequality constraint?
You want to change the objective to maximize from minimize?
A variable is not constrained?
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
How do we know with in the simplex (tableau or basis representation) that the current
solution is optimal?
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
How do you know in the simplex (tableau or basis representation) that there is more than
one optimal solution?
What is the strong duality theorem for linear programs?
Part II of the mid-term exam will have 2 to 3 longer problems. Key skills for longer
problems:
Given a problem statement, know how to formulate the corresponding mathematical
program.
Given a linear program, know how to write it in standard form and how to formulate
its dual linear program.
Know how to perform full steps of the simplex.
Know how to interpret the final tableau or final basis representation of the simplex to
extract the full solution, and to verify that the solution is optimal.
Know how to interpret the Excel Solver sensitivity report.
Know how to graphically solve a simple linear program with 2 decision
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations
Mendosas History of Blood Glucose Meters Annotations