- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
Points to consider in your reviews:
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
Did you learn anything truly interesting from the presentation (beyond just the minimal facts)?
Did the presentation include specific, in-depth examples to enhance your understanding?
Did the slides draw you in and lead you in a logical sequence?
Did you find the slides visually interesting or were they primarily bullets/text?
Did the presenter just read bullet points or present genuinely engaging details?
What were the presenter’s strengths?
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
What one practical recommendation can you make to improve the presentation?
Role of the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discussion Questions
In the most severe cases, the FDA has recently given approval for COVID-19
patients to be hooked up to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
device. What is an ECMO and how does it work? What mechanisms of mass
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
transport are involved? If you were to design your own device, what are the critical
design parameters that you would need to consider?
Your answer should be between 1 page (12-point Arial font, single-spaced, 1-inch margins)
and include at least 2 primary references* in MLA format.
here are some sources I found:
https://journals.lww.com/cmj/Citation/9000/Extracorporeal_membrane_oxygenation_support_in.99366.aspx
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/critical-care/extracorporeal-membrane-oxygenation/
https://www.elso.org/Resources/WhatisECMO.aspx
https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/37/2/339/774991
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2761778
please focus ONLY in answering the questions specifically.
Mechanism of mass transport are more likely to be diffusion and convection. please give some details about them, here is a link for general information about them:
when creating your parameter, also, think about diffusion/ convection/ pressure, …. things like this
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
In more severe cases in which the patient has trouble breathing, mechanical
respirators are required to force air in and out of the lungs. Describe: a) how
ventilators increase the oxygen delivered to the blood in the context of pressure
driven flow and b) differences between normal breathing and ventilator breathing in
how the flow of air into the lungs is driven by pressure differences.
Your answer should be 3?4 pages (12-point Arial font, single-spaced, 1-inch margins) and
include at least 2 primary references* in MLA format.
https://casereports.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2020/04/22/j.jaccas.2020.03.007
https://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=2763453
https://www.rch.org.au/rchcpg/hospital_clinical_guideline_index/Oxygen_delivery/
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
Environmental Sustainability Issues Peer Reviews for Three Pathway
