Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

Read Case NSPE No 98-9 Duty to report unsafe conditions/client request for secrecy

For the Citicorp building, occupants weren’t forced to leave but they did not choose to stay either (in fact they weren’t aware that they had a choice at all). Is that okay with you? Do they have the right to know that building remediation is occurring?

Do we as engineers have the right to act as paternalistic decision-makers over one’s safety? Do you see this as different than for example seatbelt or motorcycle helmet laws?

Course : Infotech and mobile Application

Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This is a Discussion assignment where students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and can be put into practice within their own career.

This is a DISCUSSION; please post your response as a Discussion:
Respond to the Discussion prompts. No cover page, citations, nor reference page is required for this submission. Replying to classmate’s posts is your option. But, do submit this Discussion by Thursday(midnight) – this is a short week; courses ends on 10/15.

Provide a reflection of at least 500 words of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study.

Post in this Discussion forum a discussion of at least 500 word (that’s about 2 pages double spaced).

Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

Report Unsafe Conditions Client Request for Secrecy Case Analysis

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!