Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program Solution

Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

 

Program Name: First Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program.

Evaluators need to collect data using measures (also referred to as data sources, indicators, instruments) that adequately capture the information needed to determine if a program is working well. Often, evaluators combining quantitative and qualitative measures to draw conclusions about a program’s processes or impacts, which the measure provides some information to the evaluators, and together, multiple measures can provide useful insights into a program. This activity provides an opportunity to consider measures that address real-world outcome evaluation questions.

Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

*Use the internal consistency reliability to measure the outcome evaluation question for the First Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program.

Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

*I will provide the outcome evaluation question and the credible source (question number 2) to complete the assignment.

Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

Place for Youth-Independent Living Skills Program

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!