Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
Subject: Communication
Topic: rhetorical analysis essay
Paper details:
Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
Write a 4-5-page rhetorical analysis (analysis of the argument) of a speech from the list provided. The speaker can cover any topic you’d like; the only requirements are that the speech is at least 7 minutes long and you are able to access both the video and the written transcript. You will need to complete two different tasks: (1) summarize the speaker’s argument and (2) explain how the speaker’s argument is put together. (use this link to access speech and write about that speech) ev.com/blog/transcripts/ted-cruz-gop-senators-press-conference-transcript-immigration-at-texas-border Specifics In the summary section, you will need to first introduce the speech you will be analyzing.
Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
Then you will summarize what the speaker argues, noting the central claims and key evidence. The analysis section of the paper should take up the majority of the 4-5 pages. Here you are trying to analyze and explain how the argument was put together (which rhetorical strategies it uses). How are those strategies meant to impact the audience? In other words,
how do the strategies attempt to influence the audience’s thoughts and feelings? How do the strategies relate to and support the overall argument?
Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
You will need a thesis that identifies the argumentative strategies you will discuss. Here is a sample thesis: “The speaker’s argument is mainly dependent on emotional appeals, and she/he uses detailed description and narration to support those emotional appeals.” For this thesis, you would then need to go on and give examples of different emotional appeals
that use description and narration from the speech. You need to decide which aspects of the argumentative strategy you want to focus on. You should focus on the strategies that are most interesting or obvious to you, or that you think are most important to the success of the argument. You should explain the speaker’s use of the following rhetorical strategies and concepts: · The speaker’s use of emotional appeals (pathos) · How the speaker establishes his or her credibility (ethos) · How the text’s appeal to logic works (logos) · The timeliness of the remarks (Kairos)
Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment
Communication rhetorical analysis essay assignment