Theoretical Understanding Of All Learning Outcomes
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Theoretical Understanding Of All Learning Outcomes
The assessment will assess the theoretical understanding of all learning outcomes, subjects and titles for CW from an agreed list provided by the unit team. Students may also propose their own titles to the course team, if you wish to do this contact Jonathan, Mo or Gareth to get your own title agreed. We expect to see research on the topics, correctly cited and referenced, as well as your own critical examination of the topic. The MAXIMUM length is 4000 words; however,brevity and succinctness are generally regarded favourably by the markers. A single mark that relates to generic level 7 performance will be given, as well as feedback on contents and the arguments you have presented.
À la carte essay titles.
Theoretical Understanding Of All Learning Outcomes
- Advice for the unlawful: How to stop a forensics examiner from recovering evidence from your computer.2. What are the best ways of hiding or disguising obscene images? How can images be made less useful for forensics analyst?3. Attribution: Is it ever possible to say with certainty that a specific person was responsible for an action on a computer? Discuss.4. Case review of UK and International criminal case(s) that have involved the use of encryption.5. Malware and the forensic analyst6. The digital forensic challenges of (one of)1. Drones2. Wearable Technology3. Internet of Things
Theoretical Understanding Of All Learning Outcomes
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Theoretical Understanding Of All Learning Outcomes
Theoretical Understanding Of All Learning Outcomes