ECON 301 European Union Economy 1998 Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
ECON 301 European Union Economy 1998 Discussion
Instructions
Title:
How to Save the Euro–and the EU. By: Farrell, Henry, Quiggin, John, Foreign Affairs, 00157120, May/Jun2011, Vol. 90, Issue 3
Database:
International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center
Assignment: Read the article “How to Save the Euro—and the EU.” Then find additional articles in the library on the topic of the state of the various EU member economies and the EU in general. Write a 500 to 750 word paper in APA format responding to the following questions.
- 1.Classify the EU economy. Are all of the member nation economies classified the same?
2.2.Are the U.S. and EU economies linked? Why do you think not, or how so?
3.3.What measures have the EU (or member nations) taken to mitigate the current economic problems?
4.4.What is your economic outlook for the EU nations (you may address the EU as a whole or choose a specific member nation)?
ECON 301 European Union Economy 1998 Discussion
Data Center Essay
Topic: data center
The assignment is only to complete Section 3 Approach (or Method) and Section 4 Results. You need to collect data, analyze and give reslts for the two parts.
Objective/aim
Method/design
ECON 301 European Union Economy 1998 Discussion
Results/findings
Conclusion/discussion
Keywords
The assignment is to complete Section 1 Introduction and Section 2 Literature Review by March 23. Make sure that completion is better than perfection.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow ECON 301 European Union Economy 1998 Discussion
ECON 301 European Union Economy 1998 Discussion