Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project Solution

Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project

The purpose of this activity is to encourage each student to do a self assessment on his/her progress , to date, in each of my courses. Some students have a specific grade goal in mind, while others merely want to pass the course. Regardless, I encourage you to take stock of how you are doing while it may still be possible to close the gap between how you are, in

fact, doing , and how you would like to end up and to then ,reduce the issues if our seeing your overall performance through different lenses. This exercise requires that you take an honest and hard look at your performance to date in all dimensions of the course, in relation to all the course’s requirements and expectations. Let’s consider some of the primary

dimensions to consider, such as those, below, and any others you should consider.

  Examinations: readiness, grades, daily preparation processes, etc.;

  Assignments: comprehension, research, preparation, thoroughness, appropriateness, relevance, timeliness supplements, value added, value gained, etc.;

  Research: independent initiatives to expand your understanding, required research, relevance, supplementary efforts to expand ,deepen, and strengthen your knowledge, value added ,value gained etc.;

  Class participation: elements, contribution, level, quantity, questions, comments, challenges, quality, preparation, initiative, value added, etc.;

  Attendance: refer to BSU and College of Business policies, etc.;

Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project

  Special activities: participation level, extraction of value, etc.;

  Study group activities: sufficiency, focus, value, contribution, etc.;

  Papers/projects/case analyses/etc.: comprehension, thoroughness, focus, structure, appropriateness, value added, value gained, level of effort, quality, etc.;

  Extra credit: relevance, value added, value gained, appropriateness, structure, level of effort, etc.

  Don’t do’s/look out for’s, violations, etc- anything that tends to reduce your capacity to do well or otherwise reduce your grade;

Be sure to consult the course outline, the course packet, online rubrics, my class comments, university policies, College of Business policies and anything else that serves as guidance, etc. Again, be complete and honest with yourself, and then, govern yourself accordingly.

Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project

Self-Assessment on Progress Question Essay Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!