Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis
Description
Feedback comments Albin, Almost there.
First, the order is confusing. I have followed in the rubric below the order of the artworks as they are presented in the assignment prompt. For future reference, regardless of course, always follow the ordering of individual sections as suggested by the prompt.
Second, as an art critic you are responsible for providing a context for your analysis and interpretation. To that end, please add the following information for each of your separate discussions of the various art works:
1. The name of the artist.
2. The title of the artwork.
That information is not the fullest possible context, but for the purposes at hand it is a sufficient one.
All best,
Jon
Here is the rubric for this second assignment:
Work no. 1
Elements:3
Vocabulary:3
Subject/Movement:3
Coverage:1
Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis
Work no. 2
Elements:3
Vocabulary:3
Subject/Movement:3
Coverage:1
Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis
Work no. 3
Elements:3
Vocabulary:3
Subject/Movement:3
Coverage:1
—
Work no. 4
Elements:3
Vocabulary:3
Subject/Movement:3
Coverage:1
—
Work no. 5
Elements:3
Vocabulary:3
Subject/Movement:3
Coverage:1
—
Work no. 6
Elements:3
Vocabulary:3
Subject/Movement:3
Coverage:1
Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis
Using Trade Vocabulary to Describe Works of Art Analysis