Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper
3) Eskenazi Museum of Art assignment
Write an essay comparing the following two works, both in the Eskenazi Museum Art:
– Antiveduto Grammatica, Judith and Holofernes, ca. 1610-15
– Matthias Stomer, Mocking of Christ, ca. 1640
How are these two paintings similar and/or different from the work of Caravaggio?
What I am asking you to do here is to write a classic, five paragraph essay, though you may choose to expand it beyond that basic requirement. It should include an introductory paragraph that has a clear thesis statement and it should finish with a concluding paragraph. What makes this different from most other essays is that you will be writing about what you
see. Each work of art should be introduced with a description. What you are trying to do with that is to convey the appearance of the work of art to someone who is not able to see it. Start with the obvious and general, and then move to the particular. Make sure that your text conveys an overall impression of the work and does not read like a list.
Photographs Art Analysis
4 to 5 pages;
Read the four articles listed below (all available on Blackboard or in texts), and choose
Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper
an approach or a combination of approaches that makes sense to you.
John Szarkowski, “The Photographer’s Eye”
Jules Prown, “Mind in Matter”
Roland Barthes, “The Photographic Message”
Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”
Choose a method or methods to help you write a formal analysis paper on a single
Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper
photograph. Choose ONE photograph from the list of choices below.
Your third option is to pick one of the 17 images that are Museum of
Fine Art images, available to view online through the links below.
Analyze it formally and carefully, using your
chosen method. At the end of your paper, briefly suggest further directions for
research, if you were to extend this project to a research paper. Make sure you list the
artist and title of the work you choose for your paper, and an image for reference.
PICK ONE PHOTOGRAPH TO ANALYZE:
A: At The Boston University Art Gallery; 855 Commonwealth Avenue (CFA
building), first floor. View one of these in person
- Zaneli Muholi, Qiniso 1, The Sails, Durbani, 2019
- Zaneli Muholi, Thatha Konke I, Sheraton Hotel, Brooklyn, 2019
- Hank Willis Thomas, Baron of the Croosroads, 2012
or
B: Choice of images from Deana Lawson show at the ICA
or
C: Digital images from the Museum of Fine Arts collections, available online
1.
Alfred Stieglitz (American), The Flatiron (New York), 1903, 50.833
https://collections.mfa.org/objects/4627/the-flati…
2.
Alfred Stieglitz (American), Georgia O
Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper
Bloomington Eskenazi Museum of Art Paper